Skip to main content

Karma as the Source of Diversity

The Vedas recognize divine karma (the action of God) as the source of all creation, preservation and destruction. However, since God performs them without desires, unlike human beings he is not bound by them. From the first chapter of the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad (1.6.1) we learn that karma is one of the triple causes of diversity, the other two being name and form. The diversity in names arises from speech, and the diversity in forms comes from the eye, whereas the (mind and) body is the sources for the diversity in actions. For all actions, the body is the source, the controller, or the lord. Within the body, the mind, the speech, breath, the organs of action, and the organs of perception are considered the main deities who receive their share of food from the body and perform their actions. However, we cannot fully rely upon them to fight the impurities and the evil that can infest our body, since they are all vulnerable to evil and demonic actions, thoughts, desires, temptations, a

WHAT IS REALITY?


Much of the confusion will disappear if we see Brahman not as a being, but as a supreme state. It becomes a being through its numerous manifestations. However, in its pure and absolute state, it represents the highest reality, which is pure, indefinable and without names and forms. We cannot communicate with that state or reality. We can only become That or become dissolved in That. Let's think this more deeply.

If we are totally absorbed in Brahman, we will see the world differently. We will cease to identify ourself with our physical self and become fixed in the awareness, which is wonderfully expressed in the Upanishads as "Aham Brahmasmi," I am Brahman. The self-realized yogis do not declare that to the world, since it can be misconstrued by the ignorant ones. However, they remain stabilized in that awareness even in the wakeful state, battling against the duality to which the mind is accustomed and the resistance coming from the ego, which remains active even in the self-realized state, although weakened and subdued.

The whole creation is a projection or reflection of Brahman, but it is not made up of Brahman. In other words, we cannot attain Brahman by possessing material things or knowing them. We cannot find it in the objective reality, because it is not in any of its parts, aspects and components. Brahman is known only by subjectively knowing it through the Self and becoming one with it. As stated before, Brahman is pure intelligence. It is not a being, but the highest, supreme reality which is described in the texts as (kaloneness), parandhamam (highest goal), prasantam (peaceful), atitam (transcendental), advitiyam (without a second), anantam (infinite), aksharam (indestructible), anirvachaniyam (indescribable) and madhuram (extremely ecstatic).

After reading everything mentioned above, Brahman seems to be the godly thing to be worshiped as it is the most divine thing which a human possesses in oneself. Now the question is why isn't Brahman worshiped in rituals.

Reasons

Let us now examine why Brahman is not ritually worshipped.

1. Brahman represents an absolute reality which is free from names and forms and objectivity. It cannot objectively be communicated since it represents limitless subjective reality which is eternal, unchanging and self-existent. Hence, invoking Brahman through prayers or mantras is difficult and ineffective.

2. In the absolute state, the highest supreme Brahman is indeterminate, infinite and indistinguishable. We can neither conceptualize it nor fit it into a rigid, ritual model as an object of worship. There are also no known methods to communicate with it.

3. During sacrificial ceremonies and ritual worship, we invite gods to visit the ritual place or our homes as divine guests and accept our hospitality and devotion. Since Brahman is all this and infinite, there is no place upon earth or in heaven, where Brahman can descend into our world and accept our offerings.

4. Brahman is the highest goal rather than an object of ritual worship. It is to be known through internal yoga rather than external worship. The knowledge of Brahman does not arise from rituals but from spiritual practice and self-purification. Hence, ritual worship is not ideal to realize supreme Brahman.

5. There are no known symbols or images or mantras through which we can invoke Brahman. Traditionally, it is represented by the symbol or syllable Aum. However, it is more commonly used to energize and purify the mantras and prayers to invoke various gods rather than to appeal to Brahman.

 One may intellectually know about him through the study of the scriptures, but it is not true knowing. 

Comments

  1. When duality dissolves & merges into one with the Self, the supreme consciousness is realised that is Para Bramhan that is Formless, Timeless, Attribute less infinite supreme reality that is always shinning in each atom and is the only source of light in every existence. In its manifested form be it as Allah or God or Ram or any other form it manifests itself for us all through the play of Prakruti and Purusha. In that space the only sound is silence beyond all thoughts with vibrations that reverberates as Aum.

    Baba Nanak through his Guru mantra has immortalised this for us mortals as
    Ik Omkaar that reaches us to the state of Sat Chit Ananda leading to Aham Bramhasmi.
    Aum Tat Sat.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Please tweet for any doubts or problems.

Popular posts from this blog

WATER

Let's analyse the functioning mind of a worldly occupied person and the mind of a Yogi. Let's discover some similarities if any or, how they differ from each other. Although, talking about "the mind" Yogi has no place or a stand because, for a yogi, the body and the mind are separated from the pure existing self. But this blog would be on how the mind functions and what are the extra locks or keys in Yogi's mind which makes a being so adorable and Priestley. A philosophical view to understanding the functioning of these two different sorts of mind is by taking the example of the river. The river in the monsoon season has a much higher volume of water which is flowing vigorously, that is compared to the mind of a worldly occupied person. There are so many thoughts flowing, that are not in control and are also changing very fast. Also when there are landslides the river gets muddy, and then this drinkable water cannot be used by us, nor can we offer it to someone.

SILENT MIND

What are we? Is our notion of self real? How does it come into existence? Is it the sum total of our experiences and awareness? Or is it a mere notion sustained by a few persistent memories, attachments and desires? Are we the sum total of a few selected thoughts and memories or all thoughts and memories? Are we sustained by a few aspects of our past or all our past? Do we come into existence by the association of these thought and memories, or do we exist without them? If we are a selection of thoughts and memories, what happens to us when we enter into deep sleep? Do we still exist then? Such were the questions the Upanishadic seers explored in ancient India several thousands of years ago to know the secrets of existence. In doing so they followed a very unique method to minimize the interference of the mind and transcend its limitations. They silenced their minds and allowed the higher knowledge to manifest itself in their consciousness. We can do it even today. There are two types

Dvaita vs Advaita

Dvaita and Advaita are two divergent schools of Vedanta philosophy in Hinduism which interpret reality and the relationship between Brahman, the Supreme Universal Self, and the rest of His manifestation differently in terms of duality and non duality respectively. According to the former (Dvaita) Brahman and His creation are existentially and fundamentally different and according to the latter (Advaita) the difference is only in our perception and understanding since all is Brahman only and nothing else. Putting it differently, the question these two schools try to resolve is whether the distinction between the subject and the object, or the knower and the known is permanent and real or a mere illusion arising from the limitations of the senses and of the mind. Standing in between these two in terms of a compromise is the third schools known as Visistadvaita, which acknowledges notional distinction, called bheda-abheda (different from not different). The questions that everyone may gra