Skip to main content

Karma as the Source of Diversity

The Vedas recognize divine karma (the action of God) as the source of all creation, preservation and destruction. However, since God performs them without desires, unlike human beings he is not bound by them. From the first chapter of the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad (1.6.1) we learn that karma is one of the triple causes of diversity, the other two being name and form. The diversity in names arises from speech, and the diversity in forms comes from the eye, whereas the (mind and) body is the sources for the diversity in actions. For all actions, the body is the source, the controller, or the lord. Within the body, the mind, the speech, breath, the organs of action, and the organs of perception are considered the main deities who receive their share of food from the body and perform their actions. However, we cannot fully rely upon them to fight the impurities and the evil that can infest our body, since they are all vulnerable to evil and demonic actions, thoughts, desires, temptations, a

SILENT MIND


What are we? Is our notion of self real? How does it come into existence? Is it the sum total of our experiences and awareness? Or is it a mere notion sustained by a few persistent memories, attachments and desires? Are we the sum total of a few selected thoughts and memories or all thoughts and memories? Are we sustained by a few aspects of our past or all our past? Do we come into existence by the association of these thought and memories, or do we exist without them? If we are a selection of thoughts and memories, what happens to us when we enter into deep sleep? Do we still exist then?

Such were the questions the Upanishadic seers explored in ancient India several thousands of years ago to know the secrets of existence. In doing so they followed a very unique method to minimize the interference of the mind and transcend its limitations. They silenced their minds and allowed the higher knowledge to manifest itself in their consciousness. We can do it even today. There are two types of knowing: knowing by knowing and knowing without knowing. In the former there is desire, effort and egoism, in the latter there is renunciation of effort and surrender to silence. Higher knowledge arises from the latter. This affirmed in the Kena Upanishad, which suggests that in knowing Brahman there is no knowing and in not knowing Brahman there is true knowing.

The deepest mysteries of our existence are hidden in deep sleep where neither the mind, nor the senses, nor the dreams can reach? Monks tried to enter into this state through silence, by withdrawing their minds and senses and practicing meditation and austerities.

Yoga was born this way. The purpose of yoga is to enter into deep silence and simulate deep sleep to experience stillness in the absence of mind and modifications. Anyone who has doubts as to the nature and origin of Yoga should pay attention to this very ancient concept of Hinduism. Knowledge comes through silence and silence is best achieved when we practice yoga. The roots of yoga are deeply embedded in ascetic traditions of Hinduism. Yoga was not a religion. It was a method which emerged from the same beliefs and practices that gave birth to the Upanishadic philosophy and countless ascetic traditions of Hinduism.

If we want to know truths that exist beyond the mind, we should silence the mind and prevent its interference. The Buddha also entered into the silence of his mind, but there saw nothing but an absence of desire and the becoming. Hence, he acknowledged the silencing of desires, but remained skeptical about the existence of an eternal and immutable Self.

When we reach that state, we will realize that the notion of self-created by our mind is not our real Self but a superficial individuality sustained by desires and attachments. There is a far deeper identity or individuality that is not of this world and not created by thoughts or desires. That is the real Self. 

When the world is asleep, the seer is awake and when the world is awake, the seer is asleep.

.

Comments

  1. Wonderful thoughts,insight and write up.Great going 👍

    ReplyDelete
  2. Any thoughts on how to still the thoughts & silence the mind to experience sat chit anand that is being expounded by the vedas & upanishads. The whole struggle of existence is to reach the state & experience ultimate bliss.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Insightful!!! Silence or yoga both leads us towards listening and observation … very much needed in the current scenario of noise and deviated thoughts.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Please tweet for any doubts or problems.

Popular posts from this blog

WATER

Let's analyse the functioning mind of a worldly occupied person and the mind of a Yogi. Let's discover some similarities if any or, how they differ from each other. Although, talking about "the mind" Yogi has no place or a stand because, for a yogi, the body and the mind are separated from the pure existing self. But this blog would be on how the mind functions and what are the extra locks or keys in Yogi's mind which makes a being so adorable and Priestley. A philosophical view to understanding the functioning of these two different sorts of mind is by taking the example of the river. The river in the monsoon season has a much higher volume of water which is flowing vigorously, that is compared to the mind of a worldly occupied person. There are so many thoughts flowing, that are not in control and are also changing very fast. Also when there are landslides the river gets muddy, and then this drinkable water cannot be used by us, nor can we offer it to someone.

Dvaita vs Advaita

Dvaita and Advaita are two divergent schools of Vedanta philosophy in Hinduism which interpret reality and the relationship between Brahman, the Supreme Universal Self, and the rest of His manifestation differently in terms of duality and non duality respectively. According to the former (Dvaita) Brahman and His creation are existentially and fundamentally different and according to the latter (Advaita) the difference is only in our perception and understanding since all is Brahman only and nothing else. Putting it differently, the question these two schools try to resolve is whether the distinction between the subject and the object, or the knower and the known is permanent and real or a mere illusion arising from the limitations of the senses and of the mind. Standing in between these two in terms of a compromise is the third schools known as Visistadvaita, which acknowledges notional distinction, called bheda-abheda (different from not different). The questions that everyone may gra