Skip to main content

Karma as the Source of Diversity

The Vedas recognize divine karma (the action of God) as the source of all creation, preservation and destruction. However, since God performs them without desires, unlike human beings he is not bound by them. From the first chapter of the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad (1.6.1) we learn that karma is one of the triple causes of diversity, the other two being name and form. The diversity in names arises from speech, and the diversity in forms comes from the eye, whereas the (mind and) body is the sources for the diversity in actions. For all actions, the body is the source, the controller, or the lord. Within the body, the mind, the speech, breath, the organs of action, and the organs of perception are considered the main deities who receive their share of food from the body and perform their actions. However, we cannot fully rely upon them to fight the impurities and the evil that can infest our body, since they are all vulnerable to evil and demonic actions, thoughts, desires, temptations, a

BRIHADARANYAKA UPANISHAD


One of the earliest descriptions of Being in the Upanishads can be found in the discussion between Ajatashatru and Gargya in the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad. Ajatashatru, the king of ancient Kashi, offered a thousand cows to Gargya, a brahmana, if he could provide a satisfactory explanation of Being. (Brahmanas refer to texts, as well as priests.) 

Gargya said, “The person within the Sun, indeed he is the Being I meditate upon.” The king replied, “Please do not talk to me about that being. While he is the head of all beings, he is not Being.” Gargya went on to talk about the essence of the moon, lightning, space, air, fire, water, sound, the person in the mirror and his shadow. When all his explanations of Being were rejected, the brahmana requested the king to teach him. Ajatashatru led him to a sleeping person and said, “When this person fell asleep, his consciousness gathered together all his senses, including his mind, and restrained them. When he lies dreaming, his consciousness takes his senses and moves about in different worlds as he pleases. When the person is in deep sleep, his consciousness rests too. That resting place is Being.”

Then the king added, “As a spider moves along the thread it has woven from within itself, and as sparks emerge from the fire, so too do all the worlds, divinities, beings and their breaths come forth from the Self that is Being. 

Ajatashatru was among the first in the world to say that Being is not just the essence of natural entities such as lightning, space, air and fire, but also the essential Self of all human beings, as well as Truth itself. Additionally, this world and all its beings are a manifestation of unmanifest Being. 

Yajnavalkya, the chief sage of the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, was among the first to describe the consequences of our actions (karma), the meaning of the Self (Atman) and the origin of the universe. According to Yajnavalkya, our universe was first wholly undifferentiated, without name and form and without any duality of subject and object. It was only the essential and undifferentiated Atman. It then said, “I Am Being (Brahman)” and so arose its name and identity. 

It continued to differentiate and thereby formed the world and the gods, all humans, food to feed them, senses, the rest of the world. 

In a discussion with his wife Maitreyi, Yajnavalkya said our children, ways of life, the worlds, the gods, all are dear to us because the Atman is in them. The self in all beings is this Self, this eternal Brahman. All things in this world are pervaded by it, nor is anything left uncovered. When this differentiation dissolves, then only the Atman remains. In such a non-duality, when the Self is all that remains, then by what and by whom can one smell, hear, speak and understand? By what shall we know That through which all becomes known?

In a famous conversation with Janaka, king of Videha, Yajnavalkya is asked, “What light guides a person here in this world?” Yajnavalkya concludes, “He who sees the Self in his own self and sees the all in the Self, becomes a knower of Being.” Such a knower of Being becomes calm, self-controlled and liberated from all evil and doubt. 

In other sections of the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, Being is also that which is true and real. For example, it is the truth of truths (satyasya satya) that is covered by the brilliant golden disk of the Sun. This notion of Being as revealing the Truth is similar to the ancient Greek view of Truth as disclosing a concealed essence (Greek aletheia).

This manifest world is true and Being is the truth of truths.

Comments

  1. Takes one back to continous self enquiry of Who Am I leading to Sat where the I thought dissolves and only the I remains resulting in Sat Chith Ananda state of Being.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Where is this guy going to end up in his life with such amazing knowledge is just beyond imagination. Great work keep spreading such knowledge.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Please tweet for any doubts or problems.

Popular posts from this blog

WATER

Let's analyse the functioning mind of a worldly occupied person and the mind of a Yogi. Let's discover some similarities if any or, how they differ from each other. Although, talking about "the mind" Yogi has no place or a stand because, for a yogi, the body and the mind are separated from the pure existing self. But this blog would be on how the mind functions and what are the extra locks or keys in Yogi's mind which makes a being so adorable and Priestley. A philosophical view to understanding the functioning of these two different sorts of mind is by taking the example of the river. The river in the monsoon season has a much higher volume of water which is flowing vigorously, that is compared to the mind of a worldly occupied person. There are so many thoughts flowing, that are not in control and are also changing very fast. Also when there are landslides the river gets muddy, and then this drinkable water cannot be used by us, nor can we offer it to someone.

SILENT MIND

What are we? Is our notion of self real? How does it come into existence? Is it the sum total of our experiences and awareness? Or is it a mere notion sustained by a few persistent memories, attachments and desires? Are we the sum total of a few selected thoughts and memories or all thoughts and memories? Are we sustained by a few aspects of our past or all our past? Do we come into existence by the association of these thought and memories, or do we exist without them? If we are a selection of thoughts and memories, what happens to us when we enter into deep sleep? Do we still exist then? Such were the questions the Upanishadic seers explored in ancient India several thousands of years ago to know the secrets of existence. In doing so they followed a very unique method to minimize the interference of the mind and transcend its limitations. They silenced their minds and allowed the higher knowledge to manifest itself in their consciousness. We can do it even today. There are two types

Dvaita vs Advaita

Dvaita and Advaita are two divergent schools of Vedanta philosophy in Hinduism which interpret reality and the relationship between Brahman, the Supreme Universal Self, and the rest of His manifestation differently in terms of duality and non duality respectively. According to the former (Dvaita) Brahman and His creation are existentially and fundamentally different and according to the latter (Advaita) the difference is only in our perception and understanding since all is Brahman only and nothing else. Putting it differently, the question these two schools try to resolve is whether the distinction between the subject and the object, or the knower and the known is permanent and real or a mere illusion arising from the limitations of the senses and of the mind. Standing in between these two in terms of a compromise is the third schools known as Visistadvaita, which acknowledges notional distinction, called bheda-abheda (different from not different). The questions that everyone may gra