Skip to main content

Karma as the Source of Diversity

The Vedas recognize divine karma (the action of God) as the source of all creation, preservation and destruction. However, since God performs them without desires, unlike human beings he is not bound by them. From the first chapter of the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad (1.6.1) we learn that karma is one of the triple causes of diversity, the other two being name and form. The diversity in names arises from speech, and the diversity in forms comes from the eye, whereas the (mind and) body is the sources for the diversity in actions. For all actions, the body is the source, the controller, or the lord. Within the body, the mind, the speech, breath, the organs of action, and the organs of perception are considered the main deities who receive their share of food from the body and perform their actions. However, we cannot fully rely upon them to fight the impurities and the evil that can infest our body, since they are all vulnerable to evil and demonic actions, thoughts, desires, temptations, a

CHANDOGYA UPANISHAD



The Chandogya Upanishad provided one of the earliest descriptions of the return of the soul after death in the story of King Pravahana Jaivali’s instruction to a great sage, Uddalaka Aruni. This instruction was known as the doctrine of the five fires.

The king explained that the world of the heavens was the first fire. The rain from the sky was the second fire, the earth the third, the male the fourth, and the female was the fifth fire. Two paths lay before the soul after the death of the person on earth. The first path took the soul to the gods and their abodes. This northern path of the gods (devayana) was for those who sought the wisdom of Being, said King Pravahana.

For those who gave alms, a second path led them to the heavenly regions of their ancestors (pitryana), eventually returning them to earth as rain, where some of them are born again as grains, shrubs and herbs to be eaten by living beings. The form the souls took on earth depended on their previous conduct: good works meant they were born again in good families; evil conduct meant being born again as animals. A third path existed for people who neither sought wisdom nor gave alms, where the soul revolved endlessly in small creatures that were born and died quickly on earth. Thus, the world became full of creatures.

The doctrine of the five fires is interestingly similar to Heraclitus’s argument that the “being” of beings is ultimately an eternal change that is like “fire.” The doctrine’s process of differentiation based on earlier conduct also recalls Deleuze’s eternal differentiating process for creating a multiplicity of beings.

Uddalaka Aruni (8th century BCE) was the chief philosopher of the Chandogya Upanishad. In a famous dialogue with his newly educated son, Uddalaka asks about Being: “Svetaketu, since you seem very arrogant about your learning, did you ask for that teaching by which the unknowable is knowable, the unperceivable is perceived, and the unhearable is heard?”

At Svetaketu’s astonishment over such learning, Uddalaka replied that first there was only Being, “until it thought may I become many and grow.” Being sent forth fire, which wanted to become many and grow, then water, then food. “Being then thought, let me enter into these three divinities of fire, water and earth and let names and forms be developed. Whatever is red is the form of fire or heat, whatever is white is the form of water, and whatever is dark is the form of the earth.” By combining these three primary forms of red, white and dark, all the other forms in the world were produced.

Uddalaka’s main argument was that Being that is Self is the essence of everything in the world, which is a multiplicity of names and forms. He told Svetaketu, “You are That.” To illustrate, he described the giant banyan (nyagrodha) tree growing from a seed containing an essence invisible to the naked eye. Similarly, when salt is mixed in water, it becomes an invisible essence that makes all the water taste salty. In the same way, the Self that is Being is the essence of the world.

Uddalaka’s simple three-word teaching of “You are That” (tat tvam asi) was the great saying of the Sama Veda to which the Chandogya Upanishad belongs, along with three other great sayings of Rig, Yajur and Atharva Vedas. Together, they encapsulated three propositions central to all the Upanishads:

1. The Self (Atman) is the essence of all living beings.

2. Being (Brahman) is the foundational principle of the universe.

3. The Self and Being are the same.

While Self and Being are gender neutral, almost all the key players of the Upanishads were male. For a view of Being that emphasizes the feminine aspect, we need to turn to the Shakti tradition with roots in the Mother Goddess practices of ordinary people in ancient India.

Comments

Post a Comment

Please tweet for any doubts or problems.

Popular posts from this blog

WATER

Let's analyse the functioning mind of a worldly occupied person and the mind of a Yogi. Let's discover some similarities if any or, how they differ from each other. Although, talking about "the mind" Yogi has no place or a stand because, for a yogi, the body and the mind are separated from the pure existing self. But this blog would be on how the mind functions and what are the extra locks or keys in Yogi's mind which makes a being so adorable and Priestley. A philosophical view to understanding the functioning of these two different sorts of mind is by taking the example of the river. The river in the monsoon season has a much higher volume of water which is flowing vigorously, that is compared to the mind of a worldly occupied person. There are so many thoughts flowing, that are not in control and are also changing very fast. Also when there are landslides the river gets muddy, and then this drinkable water cannot be used by us, nor can we offer it to someone.

SILENT MIND

What are we? Is our notion of self real? How does it come into existence? Is it the sum total of our experiences and awareness? Or is it a mere notion sustained by a few persistent memories, attachments and desires? Are we the sum total of a few selected thoughts and memories or all thoughts and memories? Are we sustained by a few aspects of our past or all our past? Do we come into existence by the association of these thought and memories, or do we exist without them? If we are a selection of thoughts and memories, what happens to us when we enter into deep sleep? Do we still exist then? Such were the questions the Upanishadic seers explored in ancient India several thousands of years ago to know the secrets of existence. In doing so they followed a very unique method to minimize the interference of the mind and transcend its limitations. They silenced their minds and allowed the higher knowledge to manifest itself in their consciousness. We can do it even today. There are two types

Dvaita vs Advaita

Dvaita and Advaita are two divergent schools of Vedanta philosophy in Hinduism which interpret reality and the relationship between Brahman, the Supreme Universal Self, and the rest of His manifestation differently in terms of duality and non duality respectively. According to the former (Dvaita) Brahman and His creation are existentially and fundamentally different and according to the latter (Advaita) the difference is only in our perception and understanding since all is Brahman only and nothing else. Putting it differently, the question these two schools try to resolve is whether the distinction between the subject and the object, or the knower and the known is permanent and real or a mere illusion arising from the limitations of the senses and of the mind. Standing in between these two in terms of a compromise is the third schools known as Visistadvaita, which acknowledges notional distinction, called bheda-abheda (different from not different). The questions that everyone may gra